| |
| |
|
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inha
University School of Medicine, Incheon 400103, Korea.
AIM: To investigate the value of
Tc-99m ciprofloxacin imaging in the differential diagnosis
of chronic bacterial prostatitis. METHODS: The study included
4 normal subjects as the negative controls, 2 patients with
acute prostatitis or cystourethritis as the positive controls
and 59 patients diagnosed as chronic bacterial prostatitis
or chronic pelvic pain syndrome by traditional laboratory
tests. In every subject, the single photon emission computerized
tomography images were obtained 3 h after intravenous injection
of Tc-99m Ciprofloxacin. The results of the imaging were
compared with those of laboratory tests. RESULTS: On the
images, negative uptake was observed in all normal subjects,
while strong hot uptake, in the whole prostate of acute
prostatitis patients and in the whole urethra of acute cystourethritis
patients. In 13 (68%) of 19 patients categorized as chronic
bacterial prostatitis by standard laboratory tests, hot
uptake with less intensity than that of acute prostatitis
was observed in the prostate area around the prostatic urethra.
Negative uptake in the prostate was observed in 6 of 19
patients (32%) categorized as chronic bacterial prostatitis.
Interestingly, hot uptake in the prostate was exhibited
in 28 (70%) of the 40 patients categorized as chronic pelvic
pain syndrome. CONCLUSION: Tc-99m ciprofloxacin imaging
is helpful in the differential diagnosis of prostatitis
syndrome.
|
|
|
Institute of Family Planning Research,
Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science &
Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, China.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic
value of infrared image system for chronic prostatitis(CP)
and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: Fifteen
patients with CP, 17 patients with BPH and 15 healthy volunteers
were examined by infrared image system. The infrared thermal
images were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with healthy volunteers,
CP and BPH group had significantly different in infrared
thermal image of prostate, but there were no significant
differences between CP and BPH group. CONCLUSIONS: Infrared
image system is a useful tool to screen the prostatic diseases.
|
|
|
Department of Pathology, The Johns
Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Pathologists frequently sign out
benign prostate needle biopsies as "benign prostatic
hyperplasia (BPH)". There are no data indicating that
a diagnosis of BPH on biopsy correlates with either gland
weight or with the International Prostate Symptom Score
(IPSS) used to measure urinary obstructive symptoms. We
examined biopsies for average percentage of glands and average
percentage of glands with papillary infolding per case,
maximum percentage of glands and maximum percentage of glands
with papillary infolding per core per case, and presence
of any stromal nodules per case. BPH was measured in 2 ways:
(1) IPSS grouped into 3 categories (mild, moderate, severe)
and (2) prostate weight at radical prostatectomy in men
with limited cancer. IPSS was classified as follows: mild
(n = 12), moderate (n = 13), and severe (n = 10). There
was no correlation with IPSS and any of the histologic features
measured. For the 41 radical prostatectomy specimens, the
average weight was 65.3 g (median, 56.0 g, range, 22 to
117 g). There was no correlation between gland weight and
the average or maximum percentage of glands, or average
or maximum percentage of glands with papillary infolding.
Stromal nodules on biopsy correlated with gland weight.
In the 30 cases without stromal nodules on biopsy, the mean
gland weight was 51.4 g. In the 11 cases with stromal nodules
on biopsy, the mean gland weight was 77.4 g (P = 0.0125).
However, stromal nodules were not specific for a large prostate
(i.e., a 15 g prostate had stromal nodules on biopsy). With
the exception of stromal nodules found on biopsy, histologic
findings on biopsy are not specific for either clinical
or pathologic BPH. Thus benign prostate biopsies should
be signed out merely as "benign prostate tissue."
|
|
|
Servicio de Analisis Clinicos. Departamento
de Ciencias Morfologicas y Cirugia. Hospital Universitario
Principe de Asturias. Alcala de Henares. Madrid.
BACKGROUND: PSA (prostatic specific
antigen) is the most used tumor marker to monitor prostate
cancer (PC). It is an acceptably sensitive test. Molecular
forms of PSA give a chance to improve its specificity. We
have evaluated the usefulness of the ratio free PSA/total
PSA (f-PSA/t-PSA%) to diagnose prostate cancer, in the range
between 4 and 20 ng/ml; i.e. the interval in which values
overlap for patients with PC and benign prostatic hyperplasia
(BPH) in our environment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective
study on 269 patients, 73 with PC and 196 with BPH. Both
t-PSA and f-PSA were determined using microparticles enzyme
immune assay (MEIA) with AXSYM (Abbott) analyzer. RESULTS:
Statistically significant differences were evidenced in
f-PSA/t-PSA% for patients with PC vs. BPH; but that did
not happen for t-PSA values. Sensitivity and specificity
values were established for different cut-off points. ROC
curve analysis proved diagnostic efficacy was better for
f-PSA/t-PSA% than for t-PSA. CONCLUSIONS: f-PSA/t-PSA percentage
is a useful tool for the differential diagnosis between
PC and BPH. A ratio lower than 12% selects a population
with high risk of cancer. A percentage over 18% is useful
to avoid or delay the indication of biopsy.
|
|
|
The computer program "Prostate"
(Windows, 1.0 version) is designed to assist the urologist
in: objective assessment of the lower urinary tract in benign
prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), accumulation and storage of
information on the patients (data file), comparison (text,
graphics) with previous data to control the course of the
disease, treatment efficacy, to refer to international recommendations
and recent advances in the treatment of both BPH and its
complications. The status of the lower urinary tract is
to be described basing on the IPSS and QOL tables, PSA findings,
rhythm of spontaneous uresis, uroflowmetry, residual urine,
prostate size, laboratory and microbiological urinalysis.
The program "Prostate" is a new step in medical
recording and efficacy of BPH treatment assessment in urology.
|
|
|
Arzt fur Allgemeinmedizin, Munchen.
Despite the availability of modern
urological methods, the diagnosis and therapy of benign
prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) continues to present problems
that are due in part to the discrepancy between the patient's
subjective symptoms and the objective findings. With the
aim of achieving a "clear" picture of the actual
indication or treatment, a differentiated approach involving
a careful waighing up of the patient's history, symptoms,
basic laboratory investigations and the use of conventional
sonography would be desirable in the doctor's office. The
present paper describes a rational concept for the "interface"
between the general practitioner's office and that of the
specialist.
|
|
|