Keep Me Informed Contact Us Links Anti-Aging Products Anti-Aging Methods Discussion Forum FASTING ANTI-AGING GUIDE 2005 Six proven methods for life extension DRUGS NUTRITION BIOMEDICINE QUALITY OF LIFE EXCERCISES Links Contact Us Home
 
 MEVACOR UPDATES  
 
   
  PRODUCTS LIST  
   

J Immunol. 2005 Feb 15;174(4):2327-35.
Suppression of autoimmune retinal disease by lovastatin does not require th2 cytokine induction.
Gegg ME, Harry R, Hankey D, Zambarakji H, Pryce G, Baker D, Adamson P, Calder V, Greenwood J.
Division of Cellular Therapy, and.
Intraocular inflammatory diseases are a common cause of severe visual impairment and blindness. In an acute mouse model of autoimmune retinal disease, we demonstrate that treatment with the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, lovastatin, suppresses clinical ocular pathology, retinal vascular leakage, and leukocytic infiltration into the retina. Efficacy was reversed by coadministration of mevalonolactone, the downstream product of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, but not by squalene, which is distal to isoprenoid pyrophosphate metabolites within the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway. Lovastatin treatment (20 mg/kg/day i.p.) over 7 days, which resulted in plasma lovastatin hydroxyacid concentrations of 0.098 +/- 0.03 muM, did not induce splenocyte Th2 cytokine production but did cause a small reduction in Ag-induced T cell proliferation and a decrease in the production of IFN-gamma and IL-10. Thus, it is possible to dissociate the therapeutic effect of statins in experimental autoimmune uveitic mice from their activity on the Th1/Th2 balance. Statins inhibit isoprenoid pyrophosphate synthesis, precursors required for the prenylation and posttranslational activation of Rho GTPase, a key molecule in the endothelial ICAM-1-mediated pathway that facilitates lymphocyte migration. Consistent with inhibition of leukocyte infiltration in vivo, lovastatin treatment of retinal endothelial cell monolayers in vitro leads to inhibition of lymphocyte transmigration, which may, in part, account for drug efficacy. Unlike lovastatin, atorvastatin treatment showed little efficacy in retinal inflammatory disease despite showing significant clinical benefit in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. These data highlight the potential differential activity of statins in different inflammatory conditions and their possible therapeutic use for the treatment of human posterior uveitis.


Am J Cardiol. 2004 Jun 15;93(12):1487-94.
Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe co-administered with simvastatin compared with atorvastatin in adults with hypercholesterolemia.
Ballantyne CM, Blazing MA, King TR, Brady WE, Palmisano J.
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
This study compared the efficacy and safety of co-administered ezetimibe + simvastatin with atorvastatin monotherapy in adults with hypercholesterolemia. Seven hundred eighty-eight patients were randomized 1:1:1 to 3 treatment groups; each group was force-titrated over four 6-week treatment periods: (1) 10 mg of atorvastatin as the initial dose was titrated to 20, 40, and 80 mg; (2) co-administration of 10 mg of ezetimibe and 10 mg of simvastatin (10/10 mg) was titrated to 10/20, 10/40, and 10/80 mg of ezetimibe + simvastatin; and (3) co-administration of 10/20 mg of ezetimibe + simvastatin was titrated to 10/40 mg (for 2 treatment periods) and 10/80 mg of ezetimibe + simvastatin. Key efficacy measures included percent changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) from baseline to the ends of (1) treatment periods 1 and 2 (for LDL cholesterol) comparing co-administration of 10/20 mg and 10/10 mg of ezetimibe + simvastatin with 10 mg of atorvastatin and (2) treatment period 4 (for LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol) comparing co-administration of 10/80 mg of ezetimibe + simvastatin with 80 mg of atorvastatin. Baseline LDL and HDL cholesterol levels were comparable between treatment groups. At the end of treatment period 1, the mean decrease of LDL cholesterol was significantly.


Metabolism. 2004 Jun;53(6):744-8.
Simvastatin increases bone mineral density in hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women.
Lupattelli G, Scarponi AM, Vaudo G, Siepi D, Roscini AR, Gemelli F, Pirro M, Latini RA, Sinzinger H, Marchesi S, Mannarino E.
Internal Medicine, Angiology and Atherosclerosis, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of, Perugia, Italy.
Statins are able to reduce cardiovascular morbility and mortality mainly through their hypocholesterolemic effect. Beyond the inhibition of cholesterol synthesis, the identification of "ancillary" mechanisms has motivated studies evaluating the relationship between the use of statins and the modification of bone mineral density (BMD). To date, clinical trials have provided discordant results. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether simvastatin treatment (40 mg/d) could modify BMD in hypercholesterolemic women (n = 40) after a 2-year treatment as compared with a control group treated only with diet (n = 20) and matched by gender, age, body mass index (BMI), lipids, menopausal age, and BMD and the number of osteopenic, osteoporotic, and normal women (on the basis of T-score value). Exclusion criteria were secondary hyperlipemias and osteoporosis and current or previous therapy with statins, bisphosphonates, and estrogens. The BMD was measured at the lumbar spine and hip by dual energy x-ray absorpiometry (DEXA). In the group treated by simvastatin, BMD, both on the spine and femoral hip, showed a significant increase after 8 and 24 months, respectively (0.878 +/- 0.133 v 0.893 +/- 0.130 and 0.907 +/- 0.132; 0.840 +/- 0.101 v 0.854 +/- 0.101; and 0.863 +/- 0.10, P <.001); there was a percentage increase of 1.7% after 8 months and 3.3% after 24 months at the spine; at the femoral hip, BMD increased 1.6% after 8 months and 2.7% after 24 months. The group treated only with hypolipidic diet demonstrated after 8 and 24 months a slight decrease in BMD both on the spine and femoral hip (respectively, 0.884 +/- 0.175 v 0.872 +/- 0.174 and 0.861 +/- 0.164; 0.860 +/- 0.110 v 0.853 +/- 0.096 and 0.847 +/- 0.095; P <.05). In conclusion, as partly suggested by retrospective or observational data, this longitudinal study indicates that simvastatin treatment exerts a beneficial effect on BMD.


Br J Community Nurs. 2004 Apr;9(4):160-5.
Statins and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.
Ahmed M, Griffiths P.

A mini-review (Griffiths, 2002) of double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was undertaken to assess the long-term effect of lipid lowering treatments (statins versus placebo) in secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI). The population sample was adult patients with a history of MI, documented coronary heart disease or coronary artery disease. The Cochrane Library and the database Medline were searched and three RCTs appeared to possess all of the stipulated inclusion and exclusion criteria. The trials all compared statins against a placebo; one trial was of simvastatin--the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (1994)--and the other two were of pravastatin--the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial (CARE) (Sacks et al, 1996) and Long Term Intervention with Pravastatin Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) (Anon, 1998). The trials demonstrated that statins had a clear and consistent effect in significantly reducing the risk of MI. Overall an approximate decline of 30% in MI was produced from the three trials.


Lancet. 2004 May 15;363(9421):1607-8.
Oral simvastatin treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Vollmer T, Key L, Durkalski V, Tyor W, Corboy J, Markovic-Plese S, Preiningerova J, Rizzo M, Singh I.
Barrow Neurological Institute, St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Many drugs have been approved for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis but are only partly effective, are injected, and are expensive. We aimed to investigate use of of oral simvastatin (80 mg) in 30 individuals with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. The mean number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions at months 4, 5, and 6 of treatment was compared with the mean number of lesions noted on pretreatment brain MRI scans. Number and volume of Gd-enhancing lesions declined by 44%, (p<0.0001) and 41% (p=0.0018), respectively. Treatment was well tolerated. Oral simvastatin might inhibit inflammatory components of multiple sclerosis that lead to neurological disability.


Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Jun;15(3):346-50.
Simvastatin promotes osteogenesis around titanium implants.
Ayukawa Y, Okamura A, Koyano K.
Section of Oral Reconstructive Biotechnology, Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Japan.
OBJECTIVES: Hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, the so-called statins, have been widely used for hyperlipidemic patients, and it was recently reported that it promoted bone formation. In the present study, we examined the effect of simvastatin on the promotion of osteogenesis around titanium implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten 30-week-old rats received pure titanium implants in both tibiae, and were then divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group was administered simvastatin daily. Thirty days later, all animals were killed and then specimens were prepared. The bone contact ratio (BCR) to the implant and bone density (BD) around the implant, as well as histological findings, were obtained. RESULTS: In the control group, newly formed bone could be seen around the implants. It was seen to be in direct contact with the implant surface, but otherwise unmineralized connective tissue was occasionally interposed. In the medullary canal, a scanty amount of bone trabeculae was observed. In the experimental group, in contrast, thicker bone trabeculae were abundantly seen in the medullary canal and showed a mesh-like structure. In the histometrical observations, both BCR and BD of the experimental group were significantly greater than those of the control group. CONCLUSION: The administration of simvastatin increases the value of both BCR and BD. This drug may have the potential to improve the nature of osseointegration.


Mayo Clin Proc. 2004 May;79(5):620-9.
Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Goldberg AC, Sapre A, Liu J, Capece R, Mitchel YB; Ezetimibe Study Group.
Lipid Research Clinic, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63110-1093, USA.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 10 mg of ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin with the safety and efficacy of simvastatin monotherapy for patients with hypercholesterolemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled, factorial study enrolled 887 patients with hypercholesterolemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], 145-250 mg/dL; triglycerides, < or = 350 mg/dL). Patients were randomized to 1 of 10 treatments--placebo, ezetimibe at 10 mg/d, simvastatin at 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg/d, or simvastatin at 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg/d plus ezetimibe at 10 mg/d for 12 weeks. The study began March 13, 2001, and ended January 8, 2002. The primary efficacy end point was the mean percent change in LDL-C levels from baseline to study end point (last available postbaseline LDL-C measurement) for the pooled ezetimibe/simvastatin group vs the pooled simvastatin monotherapy group. RESULTS: Coadministration of ezetimibe/simvastatin was significantly (P<.001) more effective than simvastatin alone in reducing LDL-C levels for the pooled ezetimibe/simvastatin vs pooled simvastatin analysis and at each specific dose comparison. The decrease in LDL-C levels with coadministration of ezetimibe and the lowest dose of simvastatin, 10 mg, was similar to the decrease with the maximum dose of simvastatin, 80 mg. A significantly (P<.001) greater proportion of patients in the ezetimibe/simvastatin group achieved target LDL-C levels compared with those in the monotherapy group. Treatment with ezetimibe/simvastatin also led to greater reductions in total cholesterol, triglyceride, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B levels compared with simvastatin alone; both treatments increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels similarly. The safety and tolerability profiles for the ezetimibe/simvastatin and monotherapy groups were similar. CONCLUSION: Through dual inhibition of cholesterol absorption and synthesis, coadministration of ezetimibe/simvastatin offers a highly efficacious and well-tolerated lipid-lowering strategy for treating patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.


J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Jul;88(7):3021-6.
Lovastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, induces apoptosis and differentiation in human anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cells.
Wang CY, Zhong WB, Chang TC, Lai SM, Tsai YF.
Graduate Institute of Physiology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Although only 1% of differentiated thyroid cancers transform into anaplastic thyroid cancer, this disease is always fatal. Differentiation therapy may provide a new therapeutic approach to increasing the survival rate in such patients. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors are reported to promote cellular apoptosis and differentiation in many cancer cells; these effects are unrelated to lipid reduction. Recently, we found that TNFalpha induces cytomorphological differentiation in anaplastic thyroid cancer cells and increases thyroglobulin expression; however, TNF is cytotoxic for normal human tissue. The aim of this study was to determine whether lovastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, could induce apoptosis and differentiation in anaplastic thyroid cancer cells. Anaplastic thyroid cancer cells were treated with lovastatin, then examined for cellular apoptosis and cytomorphological differentiation by DNA fragmentation, phosphatidylserine externalization/flow cytometry, and electron microscopy. Thyroglobulin levels in the culture medium were also measured. Our results showed that at a higher dose (50 micro M), lovastatin induced apoptosis of anaplastic thyroid cancer cells, whereas at a lower dose (25 micro M), it promoted 3-dimensional cytomorphological differentiation. It also induced increased secretion of thyroglobulin by anaplastic cancer cells. Our results show that lovastatin not only induces apoptosis, but also promotes redifferentiation in anaplastic thyroid cancer cells, and suggest that it and other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors merit further investigation as differentiation therapy for the treatment of anaplastic thyroid cancer.


Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003 Jul;2(7):517-26.
Lovastatin and beyond: the history of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.
Tobert JA.
Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey 07065, USA.
In the 1950s and 1960s, it became apparent that elevated concentrations of plasma cholesterol were a major risk factor for the development of coronary heart disease, which led to the search for drugs that could reduce plasma cholesterol. One possibility was to reduce cholesterol biosynthesis, and the rate-limiting enzyme in the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase, was a natural target. Here, I describe the discovery and development of lovastatin--the first approved inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase--and the clinical trials that have provided the evidence for the ability of drugs in this class to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with cardiovascular disease.


Drugs. 2003;63(7):685-99.
Lovastatin extended release: a review of its use in the management of hypercholesterolaemia.
Curran MP, Goa KL.
Adis International Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.
Lovastatin extended release (ER) provides a new form of delivery for lovastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. Lovastatin ER delivers the drug in a more sustained fashion, as shown by a smoother plasma concentration-time profile, a lower maximum plasma concentration and a prolonged half-life compared with that of lovastatin immediate release (IR). At dosages of 10-60 mg/day, lovastatin ER significantly reduced levels of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and triglycerides, and increased levels of high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia in a randomised, double-blind study of 12 weeks' duration. These effects were maintained in a 6-month extension study in which patients received lovastatin 40 or 60 mg/day. In a randomised 4-week study in 24 patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia, the reduction in plasma LDL-cholesterol levels was significantly greater with lovastatin ER 40 mg/day than with the IR formulation administered at the same dosage. Lovastatin ER was well tolerated in all studies and adverse events were usually mild to moderate and transient. The tolerability profile of lovastatin ER was similar to that of lovastatin IR. There were no reports of clinically relevant elevations in liver transaminases or creatine phosphokinase attributed to the drug in recipients of lovastatin ER. CONCLUSION: The ER formulation of lovastatin provides smooth and sustained delivery of this established and well-tolerated agent over the dosage interval, significantly reducing LDL-cholesterol in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. If, as expected, the beneficial changes in lipid levels are maintained during long-term treatment and further clinical experience confirms the greater efficacy of the lovastatin ER formulation than the IR formulation, then lovastatin ER is likely to supplant lovastatin IR and provide a useful option in the management of patients with dyslipidaemia and prevention of coronary heart disease.


Leukemia. 2002 Jul;16(7):1362-71.
The cholesterol lowering drug lovastatin induces cell death in myeloma plasma cells.
van de Donk NW, Kamphuis MM, Lokhorst HM, Bloem AC.
Department of Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lovastatin is an irreversible inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase and blocks the production of mevalonate, a critical compound in the production of cholesterol and isoprenoids. Isoprenylation of target proteins, like the GTP-binding protein Ras, is essential for their membrane localization and subsequent participation in intracellular signaling cascades. Lovastatin effectively decreased the viability of plasma cells from cell lines (n = 10) and myeloma patients' samples (n = 8) in a dose- and time-dependent way. Importantly, co-incubation of lovastatin with dexamethasone had a synergistic effect in inducing plasma cell cytotoxity. This effect was not the consequence of a change in the protein expression levels of Bcl-2 or Bax induced by lovastatin. The decrease in plasma cell viability was the result of induction of apoptosis and inhibition of proliferation. Mevalonate effectively reversed the cytotoxic and cytostatic effects of lovastatin in plasma cells. The cytotoxic activity of lovastatin was higher in Pgp expressing cell lines, but did not correlate with the multidrug resistance (MDR)-related proteins LRP, Bcl-2 and Bax. Lovastatin treatment resulted in a shift of Ras localization from the membrane to the cytosol that was reversed by mevalonate. The data presented in this paper warrant study of lovastatin alone or in combination with therapeutic drugs, in the treatment of myeloma patients.


Am J Cardiol. 2002 Jun 15;89(12):1374-80.
The liver and lovastatin.
Tolman KG.
University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA.
The cholesterol-lowering agents, known as statins, have been in use for 15 years and are among the most commonly prescribed drugs. Animal studies and premarketing clinical trials have given signals of hepatotoxicity, primarily minor elevations in serum alanine aminotransferase enzyme (ALT) levels. For that reason, all of the cholesterol-lowering drugs have labeling that requires monitoring of liver enzymes. Postmarketing experience, however, suggests that hepatotoxicity is rare and thus it is timely to revisit the issue. The first of the statins, lovastatin, was approved in 1986 and has acquired 24 million patient-years of clinical experience. Minor elevations in liver enzymes, i.e., ALT 3 x the upper limit of normal (ULN) occur in 2.6% and 5.0% of patients on lovastatin doses of 20 and 80 mg/day, respectively. These elevations are reversible with continuing therapy, are dose related, and are probably related to cholesterol lowering per se. Rare cases of acute liver failure (ALF) have been reported with all of the cholesterol-lowering drugs. With lovastatin, the rate is approximately 1/1.14 million patient-treatment years, which is 9% of the background rate of all causes of ALF and approximately equal to the background rate of idiopathic ALF. Monitoring for hepatotoxicity has not been effective in preventing serious liver disease, largely because of its rarity and the poor predictive value of minor ALT elevations. In fact, it may increase patient risk because of needless discontinuation of cholesterol-lowering therapy for false-positive results in patients who are benefiting from treatment.


Leuk Lymphoma. 2000 Dec;40(1-2):167-78.
Lovastatin induces a pronounced differentiation response in acute myeloid leukemias.
Dimitroulakos J, Thai S, Wasfy GH, Hedley DW, Minden MD, Penn LZ.
Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
We recently identified HMG-CoA reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme of the mevalonate pathway, as a potential therapeutic target of various retinoic acid responsive cancers. Lovastatin, a competitive inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, induced a retinoic acid-like differentiation response followed by extensive apoptosis in neuroblastoma cell lines at relatively low concentrations (<20 microM) of this agent. More recently, we demonstrated that acute myeloid leukemias but not acute lymphocytic leukemias also displayed increased sensitivity to lovastatin-induced apoptosis. In this study, we examined the ability of lovastatin to induce differentiation of acute myeloid leukemic cells and to evaluate the role differentiation may hold in the anti-leukemic properties of this agent. Increased expression of the leukocyte integrins CD11b and CD18 as well as down-regulation of the anti-apoptotic gene bcl-2 are associated with late stage differentiation of the myeloid lineage and retinoic acid induced maturation of acute myeloid leukemic cells. Lovastatin exposure induced increased expression of CD11b and CD18 markers similar to retinoic acid treatment. Following 24 hrs exposure to 20 microM lovastatin, all 7 acute myeloid leukemia cell lines tested showed a decrease in bcl-2 mRNA expression while only 1/5 acute lymphocytic leukemia cell lines showed a similar response. A role for bcl-2 in the apoptotic response of acute myeloid leukemia cells to lovastatin was demonstrated as exogenous constitutive expression of bcl-2 in the AML-5 cell line inhibited apoptosis in a time and dose dependent manner. Thus, lovastatin exposure of acute myeloid leukemia cells induced a differentiation response that may contribute to the therapeutic potential of this agent in the treatment of this disease.


Ter Arkh. 1996;68(12):72-5.
The characteristics of the hypolipidemic effect of Mevacor with its permanent multiyear use.
Lipovetskii BM.

Changes in blood lipids were assessed in the course of 4 years in 29 patients with cholesterol (CS) levels at least 300 mg/dl (hyperlipidemia). Of these, 20 received mevacor, 9 were controls. Taking mevacor in a dose 20-40 mg/day for 6 months reduced CS in the study group by 20% and by 10% more within the next 6 months. CS in controls changed unnoticeably. Lowering of the dose to 10-20 mg/day or mevacor discontinuation at the moment CS fell to 250 mg/dl or greater did not entail a rerise of total blood CS within subsequent 4-6 months.


Bratisl Lek Listy. 1994 Oct;95(10):457-60.
Biochemical and functional study of the liver during treatment of familial hyperlipoproteinemia with Mevacor (lovastatin) and Vasosan S (cholestyramine)
Kolesar P, Raslova K, Ulicna O, Kupcova V, Mojto V.
III. interna klinika LFUK, Bratislave.
The aim of our study was the biochemical and functional examination of the liver during the therapy of familiar hyperlipoproteinemia by means of MevacorR (lovostatine) in comparison with the treatment by Vasosan S (cholestyramine). We examined 20 patients treated with a daily dose of MevacorR being 20-40 mg and, 18 patients treated with a daily dose of Vasosan S being 16-32 g for the period of 12 weeks. During the therapy the total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triacylglycerols, hepatic enzymes (AST, ALT, ALP) activity, functional test of the liver, biological half-time of antipyrine (t 1/2 antipyrine) were investigated at the onset and at the end of the study. We discovered that at the end of the treatments by MevacorR and Vasosan S the hypolipidemic effect increased (cholesterol p < 0.001, LDL cholesterol p < 0.001), and there was difference in the effect on HDL-cholesterol and in that on triacylglycerols. During the treatment we discovered that due to both medicaments the liver enzymes activity increased to a different extent. At the beginning of the study the antipyrine biological half-time statistically increased in both investigated groups, namely in comparison with the control group. At the end of the treatments in both groups the antipyrine half-time was prolonged, however not significantly. Prior to long-term therapy by hypolipidemics the authors recommend biochemical and functional examination of the liver.


Probl Endokrinol (Mosk). 1992 Nov-Dec;38(6):34-5.
Use of the lipolytic drug mevacor in the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus.
Balabolkin MI, Mamaeva GG, Poliakova IA, Kniazeva AP.

Stable compensation of diabetes mellitus, including normolipidemia, underlies the therapy of diabetic angiopathies. Mevacor represents a nonactive lactone form of a certain hydroxy acid, a potent inhibitor of endogenous synthesis of cholesterol, conducive to blood cholesterol reduction. The aim of the present study was the assessment of the efficacy of this drug in therapy of patients with diabetes mellitus. Ten patients were administered mevacor in a dose of 20 mg for a month. Such therapy was conducive to a significant reduction of the levels of cholesterol, LNP cholesterol, triglycerides, and cholesterol/LVP ratio. It also promoted a reduction of the content of lipid peroxidation products in the blood, these products being an active factor of vessel destruction. The levels of hydroperoxides, blood serum and red cell malonic dialdehyde, and superoxide dismutase were also reduced. These results necessitate addition of mevacor to a complex of therapy for diabetes to normalize lipid metabolism.


Kardiologiia. 1992 Jun;32(6):19-21.
Effects of lovastatin (mevacor) on platelet function in hypercholesterolemia in patients with ischemic heart disease.
Shalaev SV, Safiullina ZM, Zhuravleva TD, Nikitina VI, Baranova TA.

The impact of a 4-week course of lovastatin (mevacor) therapy on platelet function was examined in 26 patients with coronary heart disease concurrent with hypercholesterolemia (the baseline plasma cholesterol level was 250 mg% or more). The agent was given in a daily dose of 20-40 mg. The agent in this dose was found to have no action on the thromboxane-prostacyclin balance in plasma, on the degree of ADP-induced aggregation and lipid peroxidation in platelets, phospholipid composition and levels of ester-bound cholesterol in platelet membranes. Free cholesterol tended to increase at the end of the 4th week of treatment. Despite the effective reduction of plasma levels of total and LDL cholesterols whose action on platelets is well known, there was no estimated decrease in the activity of platelets during lovastatin therapy.


Ugeskr Laeger. 1990 Nov 5;152(45):3354-7.
Treatment of severe primary hypercholesterolemia with lovastatin (Mevacor). A new therapeutic principle.
Leth A, Munch M, Nielsen B, Dollerup J.
Kobenhavns Amts Sygehus i Glostrup, lipidambulatoriet, medicinsk afdeling C.
An open clinical trial comprising 59 outpatients with severe hypercholesterolemia (including 35 patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia) and considerable predisposition to ischaemic cardiac disease revealed a dosage-related pronounced effect of lovastatin on serum cholesterol and subfractions of this. After dietary regulation for a period of four months, a decrease in serum cholesterol of 11.7% was observed and after further treatment for six months with lovastatin with an average dose of 59 mg per 24 hours, the serum cholesterol decreased with a total of 45% of original value. Low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol decreased 44% and high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol increased by over 21%. Serum triglyceride fell by 20%. The serum-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio was reduced from 8.8 to 4.9. Only slight and transient subjective side-effects were observed and none of the patients dropped out of the trial for this reason. One patient with recognized ischaemic heart disease died from myocardial infarction. A tendency towards increasing liver parameters and creatin kinase was observed in the group as a whole but was not significant.



 
 
- ACARBOSE
- ACCUPRIL-ACCUPRO
- ADALAT
- ADAMANTAN
- ALENDRONATE
- MANTADINE
- AMARYL
- AMLODIPINE
- ARAVA
- ARICEPT
- ATAMET
- ATORVASTATIN
- AVANDIA
- AZITHROMYCIN
- BENAZEPRIL
- BEXTRA
- CARBIDOPA
- CIPRO
- CIPROBAY
- CIPROFLOXACIN
- CLOPIDOGREL
- DEPRENYL
- DONEPEZIL
- DOXYCYCLINE
- ECDYSTEN
- ECDYSTERONE
- ELDEPRYL
- EVISTA
- FARESTON
- FAT BURNER
- FINASTERIDE
- FLOMAX
- FLUVASTATIN
- FOLIC ACID
- FOSAMAX
- GEROVITAL
- GLIMEPERIDE
- GLUCOBAY
- GLUCOPHAGE
- HUMALOG
- OMNIC
- IODIDE
- ISOPRINOSINE
- LAMISIL
- LARODOPA
- LESCOL
- LEUZEA
- LEVODOPA
- LIPITOR
- LIPOIC ACID
- LOTENSIN
- LOVASTATIN
- MADOPAR
- MELOXICAM
- METFORMIN
- MEVACOR
- MILGAMMA
- MIRAPEX
- MOBIC-MOVALIS
- NOLVADEX
- NOOTROPYL
- NORVASC
- ORLISTAT
- PIRACETAM
- PLAVIX
- PRAMIPEXOLE
- PRECOSE
- PROSCAR
- QUINAPRIL
- RALOXIFENE
- RHAPONTICUM
- RHODIOLA
- ROSIGLITAZONE
- SELEGILINE
- SELENIUM
- SIMVASTATIN
- SINEMET
- SUMAMED
- TAMOXIFEN
- TAMSULOSIN
- TERBINAFINE
- TOREMIFENE
- VALDECOXIB
- VINPOCETINE
- VIREGYT
- XENICAL
- ZITHROMAX
- ZOCOR



 
Home Contact Us ANTI-AGING GUIDE 2003